Frank P. Winston

Frank is licensed in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Texas, and Florida. For over 28 years, his primary area of practice has been representing individuals and business owners in complex coverage and bad faith actions against insurance carriers. Over the course of his career, he has had the privilege of successfully representing countless victims of natural disasters including policyholders harmed by Hurricane Irene, Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Maria, and Hurricane Irma, recovering tens of millions of dollars for his clients. Mr. Winston’s practice also includes broker negligence, torts involving residential and commercial property, commercial construction losses, and significant bodily injury claims arising out of construction and motor vehicle accidents. Mr. Winston’s practice is broad-based, including mediations, trials, appeals, hearings, and appraisals.

Frank lectures several times a year on first-party insurance coverage issues before trade groups including the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA), the Professional Property Adjusters Association of New Jersey (PPAANJ), the New York State Trial Lawyers Association (NYSTLA), the New Jersey Attorneys for Justice (NJAJ) and Harris Martin.

Frank spends his time away from the office with his wife, 2 daughters, and his beloved dog Namath and kitten Gypsy, trading his law license on weekends for a chauffeur hat driving his girls to cheer practice and friends’ houses.

Property Damage Attorney

Property Damage Attorney

Property Damage Attorney

  • Admissions

  • New York, 1994
  • United States District Court (USDC), Southern District of New York, 1994
  • USDC, Eastern District of New York, 1997
  • New Jersey, 2004
  • USDC, District of New Jersey, 2004
  • Pennsylvania, 2012
  • USDC, Middle District of Pennsylvania, 2014
  • Connecticut, 2017
  • USDC, District of Connecticut, 2017
  • Texas, 2018
  • USDC, Southern District of Texas 2018
  • United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 2020
  • USDC, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 2022
  • Florida, 2022
  • Mr. Winston’s representative cases include:

  • A $2,575,000 verdict in 2004 in a medical malpractice action, “Richard and Janet Leyda v. Praheen Mehta, M.D., et al”, in New York Supreme Court, Onondaga County
  • A $2,188,952 settlement in 2013 of an action involving adjacent construction negligence, “Wales Cluster v. Seneca Insurance Co., et al” in New York Supreme Court, Bronx County
  • A $1,675,000 settlement in 2016 of an action involving negligence in the installation of solar panels, “Fantastic Industries v. ACE Insurance Co., et al” in New Jersey Superior Court, Middlesex County.
  • An $875,000 settlement in 2016 of a personal injury action arising from a pedestrian knockdown of a 61-year-old woman
  • A $1,750,000 settlement in 2016 of a first-party insurance action involving Superstorm Sandy damage to a printing facility in Carlstadt, New Jersey
  • A $900,000 settlement in 2017 of a third-party property damage action involving a water leak into a luxury apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side
  • A $5,000,000.00 settlement in 2019 of a first-party property insurance claim involving Hurricane Irma damage to shopping centers located in West Palm Beach and Lake Worth, Florida
  • A $2,500,000.00 settlement in 2020 of a personal injury action arising from a stairway that collapsed under the feet of a 33-year-old man causing a cervical injury that required fusion surgery.
  • A $2,100,000.00 settlement in 2022 of first-party insurance claims involving a produce wholesale facility that suffered fire damage in Hammonton, New Jersey.
  • Publications/Speaking Engagements

The Ensuing Loss clause to first party property insurance policies – cases that defined the line, NAPIA, 2017

  • This lecture focused on the history and purpose of the ensuing loss clause to first party property insurance policies.  The lecture focused on seminal cases addressing the clause, along with its application in the aftermath of catastrophic storm claims arising from Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma.

First Party Pollution and Contamination Clean Up Coverage, First Party Claims Conference (FPCC), 2017

  • This lecture was given to a national group of property insurance adjusters, and focused on Pollution and Contamination Clean Up Coverage. Particular emphasis was placed on cases that interpreted the “Absolute Pollution Exclusion” to first party property and third party liability cases, including the seminal case of “The Villa Los Alamos Homeowners Ass’n v. State Farm General Insurance Co.”

Broker’s Obligations to Ascertain Appropriate Coverage in New Jersey, Professional Property Adjusters Association Of New Jersey, 2017

  • This lecture was given to advise New Jersey Property Insurance Adjusters of a licensed insurance brokers obligations to procure appropriate coverage in New Jersey.  It particularly focused on the brokers duties to the insured, what the brokers standard of care is, particular scenarios where the broker has been held to be negligent, and discussed at length the seminal cases of Rider v. Lynch, 42 N.J. 465 (1964), ARC Family v. Ralph Parnes Assoc., 2008
    N.J.Super.Unpubl.LEXIS 1910 (App.Div. 2008) and Aden v. Fortsh, 169
    N.J. 64 (2001).,

Power of the Proof of Loss, ABA, Property Insurance Law Section, 2017

  • This lecture focused on issues that arise when a proof of loss is demanded or filed in conjunction with a first party property insurance claim.  Issues discussed include timing of the proof, whether a proper demand has been made, whether demand for proof of loss has been waived, fraud issues that may arise, and under what circumstances payment can be compelled by the filing of the proof.

Option to Repair or Replace, NAPIA – FPCC, 2016

  • This lecture focused on the issues arising from an insurance carrier’s invoking its option to repair damaged property during a first party insurance claim.  Issues discussed include timeliness in invoking the option, who may conduct repairs, under what circumstances may the insured demand replacement and under what circumstances the insured could demand that the insurer replace undamaged property to match repaired/replaced property.

Condos, Co-ops and Leased Premises, Oh My., NAPIA – FPCC, 2015

  • This lecture focused on the various issues that arise in first party insurance claims involving condominiums, co-ops & leased premises.  Topics included the particular types of insurance coverage afforded, the importance of first gathering the propreitary lease and by-laws before making any coverage arguments, typical lease provisions regarding obligations to repair and the ownership of improvements and betterments, relevant case law, and a case study.

Conducting discovery on a bad faith claim, ABA – Property Insurance Law Section, 2015

  • This seminar involved a hypothetical bad faith case and setting it up from fact finding, to framing pleadings, and through discovery, trial and appeal.  My lecture involved strategies to develop the insurance carrier’s bad faith conduct through the discovery process.

Use of Experts in the Evaluation of Superstorm Sandy Claims, NAPIA – FPCC, 2014

  • This was a lecture given to public adjusters and insurance attorneys educating them on laying a proper predicate throughout their handling of a case so their experts opinion would be admissible at time of trial.  Topics discussed included typical policy language, flood exclusions, methods to identify wind damage, and case law discussing under what circumstances the experts opinion is admissible.

Flood Exclusions in the Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy, Harris Martin, 2014

  • This was a lecture given before Harris Martin to counsel as to fundamentals of representing insureds in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy.  The lecture covered such topics as dealing with the immediate aftermath of the storm, finding policies, typical special form coverage, common law rules regarding policy interpretation in New York and New Jersey, anti-concurrent causation language upheld in both states, how to prove causation in light of anti-concurrent causation language, methods of establishing wind damage, use of experts, and the lawyers role for ensuring the expert’s opinion is sufficiently founded to avoid preclusion.

Harris Martin Superstorm Sandy Conference, New York City, June 2013

  • Finding Coverage for Superstorm Sandy Claims – A Primer for the Policyholder’s Attorney

Flood v. Wind, Coverage Issues following Superstorm Sandy, Harris Martin, 2013

  • This was a lecture hosted by Harris Martin designed to educate practitioners who do not focus on insurance coverage disputes the fundamentals of representing insureds following Superstorm Sandy.  Covered topics included NFIP policies, the general flood exclusion to private policies, whether storm surge is excluded, Katrina cases discussed as a guide to how Courts might rule on Sandy cases, whether wind driven water is excluded under typical private policies, New York and New Jersey case law on causation issues, anti-concurrent causation and how it applies to a coverage analysis, and cases in New York and New Jersey addressing anti-concurrent causation on storm cases.

Handling Superstorm Sandy Claims, NJAJ, 2012

  • This was a lecture given at the request of NJAJ following Superstorm Sandy to assist practitioners who did not specialize in insurance coverage to represent their clients who may have suffered storm damage.

Handling Superstorm Sandy Flood Claims, NYSTLA, 2012

  • This was a lecture given at the request of NYSTLA in the immediate aftermath of Superstorm Sandy to assist attorneys whose focus is not insurance coverage matters to best represent their clients who had suffered damage.

 

Frank’s achievements have been recognized by SuperLawyers, who honored him as a selectee each year consecutively since 2017.

Get a Free Consultation